The war being waged by politicians is being done to allow the bloated budgets to be balanced on smoker’s backs who are attempting to live lives that are healthier. If the bureaucrats in big government really wished to assist people to stop smoking, they would welcome the increasing evidence that suggests that these products may possibly save millions of lives as well as billions spent on health care.
Some people have attempted to quit tobacco cigarettes by using electronic cigarettes and vaping instead. This is happening even before the FDA has given approval to e-cigarettes as a possible way to quit smoking.
Electronic cigarettes were initiated as a tool which could assist smokers to quit smoking. Their marketing isn’t aimed at non-smokers, or teenagers, but rather marketed to those seeking to quit smoking. You can go to www.e-zigarettenstudie.de/ to read more about using e-cigs to quit smoking.
Regardless, the FDA has not endorsed any electronic cigarettes as being effective or safe in assisting smokers to quit smoking. They do however, state that those who’ve quit smoking successfully by vaping, should carry on using electronic cigarettes due to them being a more healthy alternative to tobacco cigarettes.
Even though e-cigarette users clearly understand that e-cigarettes may be used as a tool to stop smoking as well as a much safer substitute to smoking, they are not able to be marketed as either. The FDCA prevents their use as a tool to stop smoking, and the Tobacco Control Act prevents them from being used as an alternative for reduced risk.
Accordingly, electronic cigarettes are sold as tobacco products. Although e-cigarettes may be able to assist in preventing smoking, using them is at present clouded through political issues and legal tangles. This evidences that further research regarding the efficacy and safety of e-cigarettes has to be conducted. Further strict quality control tests should be done so that the political and legal ramifications involving these products may be sorted out.
The benefits derived from vaping counteract the risks involved. As a way to quit smoking, vaping is definitely the first genuine method available. Quite a number of smokers become “dual users” in the beginning. It is known that based on the general population, a great number of “duel users” continue on to stop smoking completely, although it can’t be predicted for each individual. However, not every dual user will remain a dual user. This is because the dual use in merely a step on the way to stopping smoking completely.
The majority of vapers don’t believe that advertising of e-cigarettes glamorizes smoking but that it rather glamorizes vaping. They do however believe that if advertising is focused more on marketing e-cigarettes as a method to stop smoking, the more the public health benefit may be achieved from these products. At present, should products of an e-cigarette company be marketed by them for smoking cessation, they will run the risk of claiming a therapeutic benefit and as such have the FDA remove it from the market. Most believe that e-cigarette companies should be allowed by the FDA to be truthful regarding the purpose of the product instead of them thinking they are claiming that it is therapeutic.
Michael Siegel, a community health sciences professor at a Boston University is a renowned expert on the marketing, health risks as well as regulatory policies regarding cigarettes. His argument is that the disagreement over electronic cigarettes is erroneous as it clouds the useful benefits that these devices offer people who wish to quit smoking.
As only approximately six per cent of smokers of cigarettes who attempt to quit succeed, and as the tobacco industry continues to sell cigarettes regardless of the risks to health, Siegel is worried that as the government is focusing on possible harm from e-cigarettes, this could detract from their possible benefits for those people who’d like to quit smoking.
Michael Siegel has become known as possibly the country’s most esteemed advocate of public health for e-cigarettes. Siegel isn’t at present researching e-cigarettes but opines the device could possibly assist a substantial amount of smokers to quit, or at least largely reduce the habit that is the chief cause of death that could be prevented in the US.
He explains that in spite of all existing products on the market to aid smoking cessation, only a small number of cigarette smokers are able to quit. American Cancer Society research shows that only four to seven percent quit the habit without medication or a replacement for nicotine. Siegal also opines that further research is required regarding the effects on one’s health from e-cigarettes including their efficacy in assisting people to stop smoking.
From 2009 to 2016 it has been brought to light through surveys that perception of e-cigarettes quadrupled and that there has been a significant embracement among traditional smokers. There are both ex-smokers as well as current smokers using e-cigarettes as a replacement for nicotine to enable them to either quit or reduce smoking while others are using e-cigarettes as an alternative to tobacco cigarettes as they are less harmful.
A survey also discovered that after six months, vaping e-cigarettes lowered the use of tobacco cigarettes by eighty per cent after six months and fifty per cent after twenty-four months. A further trial discovered comparable reductions in both cigarette consumption as well as cigarette abstinence after a trial run over a period of a year which used e-cigarettes not only for normal smokers but also for chronic schizophrenic smokers as well. Withdrawal symptoms were discovered to be minimal as was the acceptance and perception of e-cigarettes by normal smokers, including schizophrenic patients.